Big Tech and the US Midterm Elections: Political Visibility Under Pressure

RESEARCH UNITED STATES DIGITAL RIGHTS ELECTIONS META

Repro Uncensored has received reports of censorship and restrictions affecting political expression and organizing across Meta’s platforms ahead of the November 3 US midterm elections. Account suspensions and unexplained visibility declines raise concerns about voter outreach, access to information and democratic participation.

November 1, 2026 | United States and international findings | Ongoing research

The reports include disruptions affecting campaign outreach and protest organizing, alongside accounts describing unusually limited distribution of political content. Together, they warrant scrutiny of how platform enforcement and recommendation systems shape access to information when opportunities to communicate are particularly time-sensitive.

Account suspensions affecting political organizing

On October 28, Angie Nixon publicly reported that @latinosconangie, an Instagram account used for her Senate campaign’s Latino voter outreach, had been suspended while the campaign was posting from a get-out-the-vote rally in Osceola County, Florida. The accompanying platform notice cited account integrity. Nixon described the page as a critical communication channel for reaching Latino voters and called for its immediate restoration.

The incident follows the reported wrongful suspension of the No Kings Instagram account during a major protest mobilization. These cases illustrate how platform decisions can interrupt the channels campaigns and civic movements rely on to organize, communicate and reach their communities.

Even when a restriction is reversed, an account restored after a rally or a crucial period of voter outreach cannot recover every conversation or opportunity lost while it was unavailable.

Reports of reduced political visibility

Our joint publication with FEMINIST also highlighted concerns about political information reaching fewer people. An Instagram performance comparison showed an election-related post receiving substantially fewer views than typical posts between October 27 and 29.

Disinformation educator Abbie Richards separately told FEMINIST that a video examining disinformation tactics targeting Black, brown and new Americans had performed worse than anything she had previously posted. She reported a four-to-one ratio of likes to reposts, indicating that viewers were sharing the material despite its limited distribution.

These experiences raise questions about whether political and civic information is reaching its intended audiences. Individual performance comparisons cannot establish deliberate suppression, but the reported declines warrant investigation alongside the account suspensions affecting political organizing.

Further investigation into follower losses and involuntary unfollowing

Alongside these election-period concerns, Repro Uncensored is conducting a further investigation into more than 70 reports of unexplained follower losses and declining visibility across Meta’s platforms.

We are reviewing testimonies, screenshots and account analytics, including reports from people who discovered they no longer followed accounts they had deliberately chosen to follow.

In France, Tiffany (@la.graine.dune.voix) reported discovering in late October that she was no longer following Jean-Luc Mélenchon, despite not having chosen to unfollow him. French contributor Osmose / Folle Errante (@o.s.m.o.s.e), whose work includes feminist and sex workers’ rights advocacy, similarly reported finding accounts missing from her following list without having unfollowed them.

Other recent reports concern sudden audience losses. Indigenous artist and activist Nicholas Galanin (@nicholasgalanin) reported losing several hundred followers within one or two days in late October. Political comedian @teracomedy_ reported unexplained follower losses and people discovering they had unfollowed the account without intending to.

These reports broaden the investigation from restrictions on publishing to the reliability of people’s chosen information networks. If users are disconnected from political figures, journalists or advocates without their knowledge, both the speaker’s ability to communicate and the audience’s access to information may be affected.

The reports describe different experiences and timeframes. Some concern recent changes; others predate the current election period by months or years. Our investigation distinguishes between reduced reach, falling follower totals, follower turnover and reported involuntary unfollowing rather than assuming a shared cause.

An international context

The US reports follow Repro Uncensored’s documentation of restrictions affecting political and civic expression in Brazil and Albania.

In Brazil, we documented more than 100 election-related cases involving account suspensions, content removals and other restrictions. In Albania, coordinated copyright complaints targeted activists, journalists and civic platforms documenting protests.

These incidents involve different enforcement mechanisms and circumstances. They nevertheless demonstrate how disruptions to digital communication can weaken access to information and participation during politically consequential moments.

Transparency and democratic participation

Our documentation does not establish that the reported incidents share a technical cause or form part of coordinated electoral interference. It identifies disruptions affecting political communication that require explanations, independent scrutiny and timely remedies.

This emerging pattern of digital ostracization threatens freedom of expression when political and civic voices lose access to their audiences without meaningful explanation or accountability. During an election, delays in resolving restrictions can have consequences that later reinstatement cannot fully repair.

Repro Uncensored calls for independent oversight, specific reasons for restrictions, meaningful human review and enforceable safeguards for access to information and democratic participation.

No private corporation should have unchecked power over whose voices are heard when democracy is on the line.

Documentation & Resources

Next
Next

Press Release: Dozens of pro-Lula Instagram accounts already affected as Bolsonaro seeks restrictions on network of 1,500 ahead of Brazilian election